DAD IN 2015
Find more photography from me in my Photo Index.
ME: I had a call from a long-distance-sounding person this morning (you know what I want to say but I don't want to be challenged for racial stereo-typing).
HIM: I am from the Windows servicing company and he was going to sort out my computer problem.
ME: I don't have a computer, I said.
HIM:Oh, I understand, maybe you have an Apple?
ME: Yes, and a banana or two in the fruit dish.
HIM: Well, do not worry, we are the Apple servicing company.
ME:You said you were Windows. Make your mind up.
HIM: We do it all , Sir.
ME: What is the name of your company?
HIM: Yes. We are technical company for Apple.
ME: Oh good, I said, because when I rang you yesterday you said you were coming round to fix it. What time are you coming round?
HIM: That is all right Sir, we are going to fix it now.
ME: I could drive it round to you this morning.
HIM: We are fixing the problem.
ME: Oh. okay. Are you driving round this morning or this afternoon?
HIM: We are fixing it now. But first I need your card details.
ME: What card details?
HIM: In order to get the servicing details You need to pay us ninety pounds.
ME: Are you sure you're aware of my computer problem? It won't switch on.
HIM: Our technical servicing will be coming on now to fix it, but in order to get the service we need the card details.
ME: Ok, hold on. I will have to go and find my cards. Can you call back in ten minutes?
HIM: No problem, we will wait. We will stay on the line.
ME: ... left him waiting awhile.
Gave him false numbers, for the card, several times.
A technical guy came on the phone, asking me what I could see on the screen. It's all black, I said. The problem is I can't switch it on.
HIM: Don't worry, we will fix it now, he said. Can you see the cursor?
ME: No it's black, I can't see a cursor.
Well this nonsense went on awhile.
The first man came on again wanting to recheck my card numbers. More pallava over the fictitious sequence of numbers.
Then he wanted my date of birth.
ME: Why do you need my date of birth?
HIM: Because I am telling you all the servicing details that will be coming to you for the paperwork need to have your name and details on.
ME: I asked him for his date of birth.
HIM: Why do you want that?
ME: Well, it's only fair, if I tell you mine. Do you think you might fancy me or something?
HIM: Can you give me your card numbers again?
ME: Let's talk about the weather. Do you have a nice view, today?
HIM: It's very sunny.
ME: Oh right. Are you in New York?
HIM: It is a very nice day. Do you have your card numbers?
ME: You're just chatting me up. You do fancy me, don't you? Do you have a girlfriend at all or is it just men you like to chat with?
HIM: err...
ME: What time is Delhi time now?
HIM: I will be leaving soon. When we have fixed your computer.
ME: Oh right. Do you think if I put the plug in it might come on?
HIM: I see.
ME: Well, you're leaving soon. Perhaps you could buy an ice cream and have a good old lick?
HIM: I am not wanting a lick, I am wanting your credit card number...
... This could have gone all day, I suppose, but eventually I told him to get a life and hung up.
People who work to expose scammers are called scam baiters. Over 95 per cent of global scam calls originate from India. Specifically they spawn from in and around Kolkata and New Delhi.
Is it to far to go for local people to attend Development Management Control meetings at Central Bedfordshire Council?
I'm not really sure if that is a genuine concern or just an excuse.
Public transport between Houghton Regis and CBC's offices at Chicksands is not easy, but it is possible. A journey by car is much easier. If people have real concerns they'll do what it takes to get there if they feel it is important to them.
There are usually several applications to be heard from all parts of Central Bedfordshire. Theoretically, it should be possible to have the councillors decide all the applications in towns local to each town affected, but I'm not convinced this would be a practical or a good use of councillors' or officers' time carting all their maps etc around.
It might however, be practical and sensible in certain circumstances to have more meetings at localised centres, such as at Watling House in Dunstable for applications affecting Dunstable, Houghton Regis, Toddington and possibly Leighton Buzzard.
The meetings might be held in the evening to facilitate attendance by people who work during the day, but this could mean they can go on until very late, and if you happen to be a councillor for say, Sandy, that means a long late night journey home. And public transport might be even more of a challenge at that time of day.
The other beef often expressed is that "councillors who don't know an area shouldn't be deciding planning matters that don't affect them".
It should be borne in mind that the councillors on that committee are offered to be shuttled around Central Bedfordshire to visit application sites prior to their meetings, so they often get access to private land that is not always afforded to the general public, so actually, they can be more informed about aspects of the applications than local people. You also need to factor in that they will have built up knowledge of how planning works, what is a planning ground for an objection and what is not.
I would hope that most councillors would want to be seen as consistent in their approach, after all, similar applications requiring decisions may be made in any part of Central Bedfordshire.
An Inspector has said that he "considers the co-operation between Central Bedfordshire Council and Luton Borough Council in particular has fallen short of the required level."
He is now recommending non-adoption of the Development Strategy Plan for Central Bedfordshire.
Cllr Nigel Young has responded saying, "I cannot and will not accept the Inspector’s conclusions that it is ‘inevitable’ for the area to meet all of Luton’s unmet need. We genuinely feel his findings are at best misguided, if not perverse, and next week I will be seeking the support of the full Council to call for a judicial review of the process."
Well, I think the next CBC Council meeting will call for a judicial review, but it's six of one and half a dozen of the other. LBC have not co-operated with CBC. At the development meeting I attended last week the 2 parcels of land in Houghton Regis off Bedford Rd were for determination as part of the overall scheme for Development. An LBC planning officer attended to verbally object but admitted they had not made written objections during the consultation period and that their councillors had not discussed the applications; it was just their planning officer objecting. As far as their ideas on planning go, he apparently wasn't even clear as to how he was to get back to Luton, as our Houghton Regis Town Clerk ended up offering him a lift back to Clophill so he could catch a bus.
The Inspector's decision will make it harder for local councils to resist other housing schemes that come forward.
By allowing building to go ahead off Bedford Rd on land that actually does include a minimum of some green stretches to broadly fit in with the aspirations of the HRN Framework Plan, CBC planning dept could argue they are doing their best to keep to the plan.
With that plan now being classed as unsound due to insufficient cooperation with neighbouring local authorities, developers could just argue back (with expensive QCs) saying that there should be no hindrance to their building. After all, they've long been saying that the Green Belt will be rolled back to the line of the A5-M1 link and assuming that it does get rolled back, then there would be nothing to stop developers from arguing the case to fill up any remaining plots. CBC would have no plan to fall back on that says "This is how many homes we said we'd build, and we've now reached that limit".